Old maps dating back to Spanish colonial times may hold the key to the claim of the Philippines to Scarborough Shoal.
Known as “Bajo Scarburo,” the shoal now called Panatag by the 
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), has been part of the known world 
since 1734, when European cartographers began to map the world in an age
 of conquest.
In fact, Bajo Scarburo appeared on a map of the “Archipelago 
Filipino” as a constituent part of Sambalez (Zambales province) in a 
topographic map of the country “drawn under the direction of Ildefonso 
de Aragon on April 15, 1820.”
Senator Edgardo J. Angara, who has a collection of ancient maps of 
the country, told the Philippine Daily Inquirer on Sunday that the maps 
would easily disprove the territorial claim of China to the shoal and 
its surrounding waters, which, he said, had no historical or legal 
grounds under the United Nations Convention on the Laws of the Sea 
(Unclos).
“It’s clear that Scarborough Shoal is part of our cartography during 
the Spanish colonial times,” he said. “We have maps (reproduced) from 
the original, which was made in 1734. During that time, Scarborough is 
already part of the Philippines.”
The DFA has asked Beijing to resolve the dispute through arbitration 
in the United Nations-backed International Tribunal on the Law of the 
Sea, but China swiftly rejected this.
As in the dispute over the Spratly Islands involving six nations, 
including the Philippines and China, Beijing has always preferred 
bilateral, where it has a clear advantage over smaller nations, over a 
multilateral approach.
But the DFA is standing by its decision to seek international arbitration with or without China.
The manuscript maps can be found in full-color in the hardbound book 
titled, “Mapping the Philippines: The Spanish Period,” authored by 
Angara, Jose Ma. A. CariƱo and Sonia P. Ner, and  published by the Rural
 Empowerment Assistance and Development in September 2009.
The book contains another map, which was published in Madrid in 1875 
and republished by the US Department of War in 1899, a year after the 
Philippines was ceded to the United States in the Treaty of Paris. It 
bears the description: “This is a general map of the Philippine 
Archipelago arising from the work of the Hydrographic Commission of the 
Philippines under the command of Claudio Montero y Gray.”
‘Mother of all maps’
The 1875 map was the “product of the most comprehensive mapping and 
charting work in the Philippines lasting more than 20 years 
(1849-1870).”
Angara said the original maps were deposited at Spain’s Museo Naval de Madrid.
A Jesuit scholar, Pedro Morillo y Velarde, came up with the first 
“complete map of the Philippines,” said the senator. This was later 
known as the “Morillo Map,” which delineated the Philippine territory 
under Spanish rule, and which became the basis for the Treaty of Paris.
Three original copies of the Morillo Map are kept in Madrid, Paris and Washington, which were parties to the treaty.
For US$20 million, the treaty gave away the Philippines to the United
 States following the humiliating defeat of Spain in the 
Spanish-American War, which ended Spain’s empire in the Americas and the
 Pacific and set the stage for US colonial hegemony.
“We have a historic title to it (Scarborough Shoal) as early as the 
17th century. It’s already on our map. All the cartographic maps 
subsequent to 1734 were based on the Morillo Map. It was the mother of 
all maps,” Angara said.
Strong evidence
“That should be a strong evidence of our ownership of Scarborough,” he said.
He noted that Scarborough Shoal’s “extreme proximity” to Zambales, 
220 kilometers, compared to 840 km from the nearest coast of China in 
Hainan province.
Asked whether the maps would establish beyond any doubt the 
Philippine sovereignty over Scarborough, Angara said: “It’s one strong 
evidence, and we have other pieces of evidence.”
Angara, who coauthored Senate Bill No. 2181, which defines the 
baseline of the Philippine archipelago, said maps had always interested 
him.
“This fascination extends to collecting old maps. I think I was 
initially attracted to them out of curiosity and because of their age 
and rarity. Maps define our territory and our sense of nationhood. As a 
student of history, I realize how maps determine the fate of both the 
colonized and the colonizers, and how even to this day, the matter of 
geographic boundaries and the desire to expand or defend them underlie 
most of the turmoil in the world,” he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Lim Ubac | Philippine Daily Inquirer | April 23, 2012 | Article Link
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment