Old maps dating back to Spanish colonial times may hold the key to the claim of the Philippines to Scarborough Shoal.
Known as “Bajo Scarburo,” the shoal now called Panatag by the
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), has been part of the known world
since 1734, when European cartographers began to map the world in an age
of conquest.
In fact, Bajo Scarburo appeared on a map of the “Archipelago
Filipino” as a constituent part of Sambalez (Zambales province) in a
topographic map of the country “drawn under the direction of Ildefonso
de Aragon on April 15, 1820.”
Senator Edgardo J. Angara, who has a collection of ancient maps of
the country, told the Philippine Daily Inquirer on Sunday that the maps
would easily disprove the territorial claim of China to the shoal and
its surrounding waters, which, he said, had no historical or legal
grounds under the United Nations Convention on the Laws of the Sea
(Unclos).
“It’s clear that Scarborough Shoal is part of our cartography during
the Spanish colonial times,” he said. “We have maps (reproduced) from
the original, which was made in 1734. During that time, Scarborough is
already part of the Philippines.”
The DFA has asked Beijing to resolve the dispute through arbitration
in the United Nations-backed International Tribunal on the Law of the
Sea, but China swiftly rejected this.
As in the dispute over the Spratly Islands involving six nations,
including the Philippines and China, Beijing has always preferred
bilateral, where it has a clear advantage over smaller nations, over a
multilateral approach.
But the DFA is standing by its decision to seek international arbitration with or without China.
The manuscript maps can be found in full-color in the hardbound book
titled, “Mapping the Philippines: The Spanish Period,” authored by
Angara, Jose Ma. A. CariƱo and Sonia P. Ner, and published by the Rural
Empowerment Assistance and Development in September 2009.
The book contains another map, which was published in Madrid in 1875
and republished by the US Department of War in 1899, a year after the
Philippines was ceded to the United States in the Treaty of Paris. It
bears the description: “This is a general map of the Philippine
Archipelago arising from the work of the Hydrographic Commission of the
Philippines under the command of Claudio Montero y Gray.”
‘Mother of all maps’
The 1875 map was the “product of the most comprehensive mapping and
charting work in the Philippines lasting more than 20 years
(1849-1870).”
Angara said the original maps were deposited at Spain’s Museo Naval de Madrid.
A Jesuit scholar, Pedro Morillo y Velarde, came up with the first
“complete map of the Philippines,” said the senator. This was later
known as the “Morillo Map,” which delineated the Philippine territory
under Spanish rule, and which became the basis for the Treaty of Paris.
Three original copies of the Morillo Map are kept in Madrid, Paris and Washington, which were parties to the treaty.
For US$20 million, the treaty gave away the Philippines to the United
States following the humiliating defeat of Spain in the
Spanish-American War, which ended Spain’s empire in the Americas and the
Pacific and set the stage for US colonial hegemony.
“We have a historic title to it (Scarborough Shoal) as early as the
17th century. It’s already on our map. All the cartographic maps
subsequent to 1734 were based on the Morillo Map. It was the mother of
all maps,” Angara said.
Strong evidence
“That should be a strong evidence of our ownership of Scarborough,” he said.
He noted that Scarborough Shoal’s “extreme proximity” to Zambales,
220 kilometers, compared to 840 km from the nearest coast of China in
Hainan province.
Asked whether the maps would establish beyond any doubt the
Philippine sovereignty over Scarborough, Angara said: “It’s one strong
evidence, and we have other pieces of evidence.”
Angara, who coauthored Senate Bill No. 2181, which defines the
baseline of the Philippine archipelago, said maps had always interested
him.
“This fascination extends to collecting old maps. I think I was
initially attracted to them out of curiosity and because of their age
and rarity. Maps define our territory and our sense of nationhood. As a
student of history, I realize how maps determine the fate of both the
colonized and the colonizers, and how even to this day, the matter of
geographic boundaries and the desire to expand or defend them underlie
most of the turmoil in the world,” he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Lim Ubac | Philippine Daily Inquirer | April 23, 2012 | Article Link
No comments:
Post a Comment