Skip to main content

China's bullying must stop

A small and weak nation can defeat a big and strong nation,” thundered the Communist Party of China way back in 1970 in a scathing commentary on the Vietnam War that by then had been tilting in favor of the Vietnamese as broad antiwar sentiment forced Washington to de-escalate the war and later agree to multilateral peace talks. Despite the technological superiority of American forces, the Vietnamese finally overran Saigon in 1975, paving the way for the unification of North and South Vietnam.
 
China’s current leadership, however, apparently forgets the lessons of history and has more and more resorted to bullying smaller nations in this part of the world in a bid to assert regional hegemony.

Chinese bullying has become glaringly evident in its response to recent Philippine efforts to accost eight Chinese fishing boats for poaching marine life in Scarborough Shoal. The Chinese fishing boats had actually collected a big number of endangered species. However, two Chinese surveillance ships stopped the Philippine Navy flagship, the BRP Gregorio del Pilar, from carrying out its legitimate duty to patrol Philippine waters. Thus, the tense standoff that persists to this day.

Beijing cites history dating to as far back as 2,000 years ago for its claim to the Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Group of Islands. It also submitted to the United Nations in 2009 a map drawn up in 1947 that contains a “nine-dash line” that is supposed to delineate its maritime borders.  But the shoal is about 230 kilometers from the main island of Luzon, while the nearest Chinese land mass is Hainan province, 1,200 km to the northwest, according to Philippine naval maps.

The Chinese historical claim, therefore, stands on shaky legal ground. Moreover, it runs contrary to the exclusive economic zones defined by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, or Unclos.

Far more worrying is China’s bellicose attitude in backing up its territorial claim. The Global Times, a newspaper run by China’s ruling Communist Party, issued a warning in an editorial last weekend of a potential “small-scale war” to end the Scarborough Shoal standoff. “Once the war erupts, China must take resolute action to deliver a clear message to the outside world it does not want a war, but definitely has no fear of it,” the editorial said.

This belligerence toward the Philippines and other claimant countries is uncalled for, and raises serious doubts about China’s claim of “peaceful rising.”

The Philippines should continue to assert sovereignty over the Spratlys by deploying our Navy and Coast Guard vessels to patrol the area as proof of our determination to assert national sovereignty.

At the same time, the government should seek a diplomatic solution to the impasse. It is on the right track in asking partners in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to take a stand on the territorial dispute.

President Aquino has indicated that the Scarborough issue would be formally raised in talks between Foreign Secretary Alberto del Rosario and Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin and their US counterparts Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta in Washington next week.

While this move could further anger China, which insists that the United States should have no role in the dispute, this is the right thing to do amid China’s warmongering.

The Philippines should stand pat on its absolute and indisputable sovereignty over Panatag and other islands in the Spratlys even as it seeks international support for its stand based on Unclos.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Business Mirror | April 24, 2012 | Article Link

Comments

More Philippine Defense News

DND wants frigate with 'surface-to-air' missile power

MANILA, Philippines - Defense spokesperson Peter Paul Galvez announced on Friday that one of the frigates to be acquired by the Philippines will have "surface-to-air" capabilities. That is, the ship will have the capability to fire missiles, guided by radar or heat sensors, at airborne targets.
"Aside from this, our latest frigate will have heavier gun armament and other equipment that will make it very effective in patrolling and securing the country's waters," Galvez said in Filipino.
He declined to state the particular country the Philippines will acquire this ship but stressed that acquisition will be done through a government-to-government transaction.
The Philippines has taken on a new sense of urgency to upgrade its naval capabilities as tensions continue to rise around the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea). US President Barack Obama's announced "pivot" for America towards the Pacific has stirred greater naval activity on the p…

No reduction in AFP manpower size

THERE will be no reduction in the number of soldiers of the Armed Forces of the Philippines when it implements the streamlining of commands by 2013, a senior officer told the Manila Standard in an exclusive interview.
“Under the Force Structure Review, there will be streamlining of units but this does not mean reduction in terms of the number of soldiers. In fact, the FSR calls for more recruits in the future,” the source, who requested anonymity, said.
At present, the military has a total of 125,000 soldiers, of which almost 85,000 are in the Army and the rest in the Navy-Marines and Air Force.
The FSR calls for an in-depth study of the AFP history in reference to pertinent laws of the land in conjunction with the challenges of internal and external defense.
The study also calls for the establishment of a strategic command that will focus on external defense where the main force would be the Air Force and Navy.
On instructions of Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin, former military ch…

Philippine Armored Vehicles with ad-hoc wood slat armor

While searching for Philippine armored vehicles for the updates being done for both the blog and the Facebook page I chanced upon images of Philippine Army and Marine armor assets covered with thick wood planks as slat armor for protection from rocket propelled grenades. This caught the eyes of Popular Mechanics who published an article last June 8th just for this subject.


According to the article,
Wood armor on armored vehicles won't save them from ISIS rockets. Not sure, I'll leave that to the actual reports from the Philippine Military in using wood as an ad hoc protection for rpg's, but yes this is only during emergencies. The Philippine Army and Philippine Marines should employ or use the real add-on armors currently in the market for armored vehicle protection. Or they could just simply buy new thicker-armored vehicles to be used for front-line operations and have the old vehicles to be used in secondary missions or as support vehicles.



Nonetheless the fast-thinkin…