Skip to main content

Expert insists Pestaño death was suicide

A forensic expert who investigated the death of Navy Ensign Philip Pestaño aboard a Navy ship in 1995 said that the officer’s family had “twisted the facts to suit their conclusion” that Pestaño had been murdered.
Forensic pathologist Dr. Raquel del Rosario-Fortun said she stood by her findings in 1995 after she was hired by the Pestaños to review the official findings—that Pestaño had shot himself inside his cabin aboard the BRP Bacolod City on Sept. 27, 1995.
The Pestaños had disputed Fortun’s claim.
Reversing a 2009 decision by her predecessor, Merceditas Gutierrez, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales in a resolution last January 10 ordered that 10 Navy officers and enlisted personnel be charged with murder without bail in Pestaño’s death.
“I’ve been consistent since 1995,” Fortun said when interviewed last Thursday at the University of the Philippines College of Medicine where she is a professor at the Department of Pathology.
“I said the evidence pointed to a suicide. And I’m (still) saying the same thing. There’s nothing new that has come up. It’s the same. It’s just that they are now twisting the interpretation of the findings,” she said.
When she gave her report, she said Pestanos’ parents Felipe and Evelyn rejected it because “they already had a conclusion,” and that she was retained “to prove that it was not a suicide.”
She said the Ombudsman did not cite any new evidence but rehashed the interpretation given  by an American “expert” hired by the Pestaño family “to say what they want to hear.”
The Ombudsman mainly relied on the opinion of Wayne Hill Sr., an American self-proclaimed forensic specialist who advertises his services on the Internet.
Fortun, who has kept a file folder on the Pestaño case, said the facts were “misinterpreted” by Hill who she said was not a forensic pathologist.
She said the Ombudsman used Hill’s claim that the contusion on Pestaño’s head was caused by a blunt object and a laceration in his left ear indicated foul play.
But according to Fortun, the two contusions that were a centimeter from the bullet hole and the ear laceration were related to the gunshot wound.
“Based on the mechanisms of how a bullet destroys tissue, (the contusion is) what is called a muzzle imprint. And then the injury near the (bullet) exit near the ear, that is what you call a laceration that is probably from the gases of the bullet exit,” Fortun said.
But the lawyer of the Pestaño family on Monday disputed Fortun’s claim, saying that the 1997 Senate investigation into Pestaño’s death discredited Fortun’s testimony on behalf of the Philippine Navy.
“If you look at the Senate committee report, she was discredited as an expert witness of the Philippine Navy. She admitted that at the time she did not have enough experience in examining cases similar to Philip’s case,” lawyer Romel Bagares said in an interview.
Bagares said Fortun had tried to make it appear that she was a “superwoman forensic expert” knowledgeable in fields like ballistics and hand-writing when she was not.
Against Fortun’s lone testimony, Bagares said, four medico legal experts and two ballistics experts trained by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation agreed that Pestaño’s death was not a suicide.
“All of these experts agreed that there was foul play,” Bagares said.
4:22 am | Tuesday, February 7th, 2012


More Philippine Defense News

DND wants frigate with 'surface-to-air' missile power

MANILA, Philippines - Defense spokesperson Peter Paul Galvez announced on Friday that one of the frigates to be acquired by the Philippines will have "surface-to-air" capabilities. That is, the ship will have the capability to fire missiles, guided by radar or heat sensors, at airborne targets.
"Aside from this, our latest frigate will have heavier gun armament and other equipment that will make it very effective in patrolling and securing the country's waters," Galvez said in Filipino.
He declined to state the particular country the Philippines will acquire this ship but stressed that acquisition will be done through a government-to-government transaction.
The Philippines has taken on a new sense of urgency to upgrade its naval capabilities as tensions continue to rise around the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea). US President Barack Obama's announced "pivot" for America towards the Pacific has stirred greater naval activity on the p…

No reduction in AFP manpower size

THERE will be no reduction in the number of soldiers of the Armed Forces of the Philippines when it implements the streamlining of commands by 2013, a senior officer told the Manila Standard in an exclusive interview.
“Under the Force Structure Review, there will be streamlining of units but this does not mean reduction in terms of the number of soldiers. In fact, the FSR calls for more recruits in the future,” the source, who requested anonymity, said.
At present, the military has a total of 125,000 soldiers, of which almost 85,000 are in the Army and the rest in the Navy-Marines and Air Force.
The FSR calls for an in-depth study of the AFP history in reference to pertinent laws of the land in conjunction with the challenges of internal and external defense.
The study also calls for the establishment of a strategic command that will focus on external defense where the main force would be the Air Force and Navy.
On instructions of Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin, former military ch…

Philippine Armored Vehicles with ad-hoc wood slat armor

While searching for Philippine armored vehicles for the updates being done for both the blog and the Facebook page I chanced upon images of Philippine Army and Marine armor assets covered with thick wood planks as slat armor for protection from rocket propelled grenades. This caught the eyes of Popular Mechanics who published an article last June 8th just for this subject.

According to the article,
Wood armor on armored vehicles won't save them from ISIS rockets. Not sure, I'll leave that to the actual reports from the Philippine Military in using wood as an ad hoc protection for rpg's, but yes this is only during emergencies. The Philippine Army and Philippine Marines should employ or use the real add-on armors currently in the market for armored vehicle protection. Or they could just simply buy new thicker-armored vehicles to be used for front-line operations and have the old vehicles to be used in secondary missions or as support vehicles.

Nonetheless the fast-thinkin…